At a glance
CUPE 3902 members have moved talks into conciliation and strike votes at the University of Toronto, affecting teaching assistants, course instructors, and postdoctoral researchers.
Teaching assistants and postdoctoral researchers at the University of Toronto have moved their contract campaign into formal dispute. CUPE 3902, the union that represents academic workers on all three Toronto campuses, has secured strike mandates for its Unit 1 and Unit 5 bargaining units and moved both files into conciliation under Ontario labour law. Unit 1 covers roughly 6,000 teaching assistants and course instructors; Unit 5 covers about 1,000 postdoctoral researchers. The escalation does not mean a walkout starts tomorrow, but it does start a legal clock that faculty and department chairs have to take seriously.
A strike mandate authorizes the bargaining team to call a strike, if a no-board report is eventually issued and the seventeen-day cooling-off period under the Ontario Labour Relations Act ends without a settlement. Talks have been underway for months. Both sides report progress on some non-monetary items, but the core money and workload language remains apart.
The University of Toronto has a long bargaining history with this local. The last major work stoppage came in 2015, when teaching assistants and contract academic staff walked out over funding levels and job security. This is the first serious escalation since then.
A strike mandate at U of T changes the timetable for departments and labs
What makes this round unusual is that it pulls postdoctoral researchers into the same escalation as teaching assistants. Postdoctoral researchers often sit outside the teaching-assistant wage grid, and their minimum support has been a recurring issue in Canadian university bargaining. At Toronto, a postdoc in a wet lab and a PhD candidate with a teaching assignment share a union local but not the same pay structure. That split runs through the bargaining table as well.
CUPE 3902 has posted its bargaining priorities publicly. The list includes hourly wage increases above current employer offers, guaranteed minimum funding packages for graduate students, paid preparation time, continuation of health and dental benefits for postdocs between appointments, stronger accommodation language for disabilities, and appointment security for people who have taught the same course for several years. The union says the university's current wage proposal does not keep pace with housing costs in Toronto.
The university's position, outlined on its Labour Relations page, is that its offers are comparable to settlements reached elsewhere in Ontario's university sector and that some workload demands would create large unbudgeted costs. The two sides are not arguing about whether inflation has happened; they're arguing about who bears the cost of it.
Under the Ontario Labour Relations Act, either side can ask the Minister of Labour to appoint a conciliation officer. That officer meets with both parties. If conciliation fails, the officer issues what is called a no-board report. Once that report is issued, the union may legally strike and the employer may legally lock out after a seventeen-day period designed for continued bargaining. There is no fixed deadline to request the report, and a report does not itself stop talks. The practical effect is that a legal walkout remains at least two and a half weeks away, and often longer.
What the escalation means on the ground
At the University of Toronto, an academic work stoppage would not hit every laboratory equally. A lab that depends on postdocs for animal care, cell culture, or data analysis cannot simply pause for two and a half weeks. A colleague in molecular biology — I'll call her Dr. S — keeps a separate lab notebook for unionized work and non-union work. When bargaining escalates, she meets with each Unit 5 postdoc to review what tasks are instructional, what tasks are grant-funded, what documentation would need to continue if a picket line appeared, and which safety checks cannot wait. Her rule is blunt: a freezer inventory that is only in someone's head is not an inventory.
That preparation, Dr. S says, takes about three hours and has prevented duplicated experiments in past disputes. It also clarifies something departments often avoid: teaching assistants and postdocs do not owe the university unpaid continuity labour. During a strike, work covered by the bargaining unit stops unless the union and employer agree otherwise.
Undergraduate students are caught in a dispute they did not choose. At Toronto, teaching assistants run many first- and second-year tutorials, and course instructors teach a large share of undergraduate courses. A stoppage would not necessarily close the university, but it would leave many courses without graded materials or scheduled office hours. Students waiting on letters of recommendation should ask their instructors early whether a labour disruption would delay submitted references.
The disruption would reach undergraduate courses, labs, marking, office hours, and some research services. Course instructors in Unit 1 may also stop grading and class preparation. The university has not stated whether it would continue some undergraduate courses remotely or rely on non-union staff; contingency planning is already happening at the faculty level.
What this means for your lab and your hiring plans
For a principal investigator, the practical first step is to identify which people in your group are Unit 1 or Unit 5 and which duties are covered by the collective agreement. Do not ask a non-striking technician to quietly absorb struck work: that can become an unfair labour practice complaint, and it leaves a paper trail that may outlast the dispute. Instead, list the minimum duties that would have to be maintained for animal welfare, human subject safety, physical equipment, and research ethics reporting, then talk to your departmental chair about which emergency work is permitted.
Doctoral students and postdocs who are weighing Toronto offers should ask the same question in reverse. Ask when the current collective agreement expires, whether a no-board report has been issued, and whether the funding letter you sign is contingent on unionized teaching work. If it is, a bargaining breakdown can change your income even before it changes your degree timeline. Our guide to postdoctoral success covers negotiating appointment letters and research support in detail.
For job candidates outside Toronto, this escalation is a data point about working conditions. A university with a large, organized academic workforce will resolve this dispute at the table, but the resolution will set a benchmark for other Canadian research universities. Postdoc minimums and TA funding packages tend to move in clusters across the country; when one major campus sets a new floor, another often matches within a bargaining cycle.
The legal clock is running
Both sides can keep talking after a strike vote, and most Ontario university disputes settle before a picket line appears. The realistic range to watch is short: a no-board report can be requested quickly once conciliation stalls, and the seventeen-day window then forces a settlement or a stoppage. Departments should not wait for the university's all-staff email to start planning. If you hold a Unit 1 or Unit 5 appointment, confirm your personal contact information with CUPE 3902, read the latest bargaining bulletin, do not accept extra duties in anticipation of a strike, and put any instruction from a supervisor in writing. Federal and provincial funding agencies will not automatically extend grant or scholarship deadlines because of a labour disruption, so students and postdocs should document any delay in writing at the first sign of one.
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash
- university-of-toronto
- canada
- higher-education-unions
- teaching-assistants
- labor-relations-compliance-and-legal

